PDA

View Full Version : Design Report Images 2006



drivetrainUW-Platt
03-03-2006, 12:58 PM
This has been done in the past, lets see em.

I wonder if UW has added to there 2000 part assembly they had last year.....

drivetrainUW-Platt
03-03-2006, 12:58 PM
This has been done in the past, lets see em.

I wonder if UW has added to there 2000 part assembly they had last year.....

Marshall Grice
03-03-2006, 02:14 PM
well where are your images? it's a 2 way street.

Kyle Walther
03-03-2006, 04:56 PM
here is a picture of our cad model so far..
http://img434.imageshack.us/img434/7218/carimage0vy.th.jpg (http://img434.imageshack.us/my.php?image=carimage0vy.jpg)

CMURacing - Prometheus
03-03-2006, 05:13 PM
hahahh i've been waiting for this post...

http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~msmiles/designreport/ (http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/%7Emsmiles/designreport/)

Erich Ohlde
03-03-2006, 07:13 PM
nice kyle. that gonna win the ptc competition again this year?

LCheung
03-03-2006, 08:43 PM
I demand UW-P pictures now! You can't ask for images unless you give images.

Kyle Walther
03-04-2006, 11:25 AM
E-rich
it might... actually we are thinking of modeling a fine woman to pose with the car for this years picture.... then maybe making a calendar..

[edit]

or we could download this model from turbosquid
http://files.turbosquid.com/Preview/Content_on_12_6_2004_20_32_38/Masha_03.jpg0bfd1095-5f50-4b7c-b9f1-014760e0e42eLarge.jpg

Erich Ohlde
03-04-2006, 03:15 PM
Suhweet.
PTC-Porn

Jersey Tom
03-04-2006, 04:31 PM
Not design report pictures.. but.. hotness.

http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae1.jpg
http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae2.jpg
http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae3.jpg

Greg H
03-05-2006, 10:18 AM
Tom,
I'm not so sure we're doing combat racing this year so you can leave the rear wheel spikes at home. Those are some good looking images though. I will post mine next week.

drivetrainUW-Platt
03-05-2006, 11:01 AM
don't get your underwear in a bind, my computer just crashed, and plus, I have been posting pictures of our parts this whole year on here... but since you asked:

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b309/duwem/2006isofront.jpg

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b309/duwem/2006isorear.jpg

Chris Clarke
03-05-2006, 11:39 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Not design report pictures.. but.. hotness.

http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae1.jpg
http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae2.jpg
http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/06fsae3.jpg </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I hope you are planning on triangulating your front bulkhead support. As per rule:3.3.6.2.B

Jersey Tom
03-05-2006, 12:43 PM
Uhh.. well they're there. They're made of transparent aluminum.

Good catch...

Kamil S
03-05-2006, 01:08 PM
I've noticed quite several drawings submitted on this forum that "miss" that rule. I'm not a chassis guy myself, but was this a fairly new rule?

CMURacing - Prometheus
03-05-2006, 01:34 PM
alright, well since all of you are posting isometric images as well, i suppose i'll give one of those a shot.

http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~msmiles/72isometric.jpg (http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/%7Emsmiles/72isometric.jpg)

Jersey Tom
03-05-2006, 03:16 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kamil S:
I've noticed quite several drawings submitted on this forum that "miss" that rule. I'm not a chassis guy myself, but was this a fairly new rule? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

It is indeed new for this year. Kinda disappointed our chassis guy missed that. At least its a super easy fix.

Steve Yao
03-05-2006, 04:22 PM
Tom,
Pics look great, but as mentioned, there seems to be a distinct lack of triangulation; and not only for the front bulkhead. None of your suspension points are triangulated either. What is the estimated stiffness of this chassis?

-Steve

Alan
03-05-2006, 04:36 PM
I was thinking the same thing. I think a couple of tubes could make a big difference.

http://img515.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture11vn.jpg

Just a thought.

Jersey Tom
03-05-2006, 05:21 PM
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree, especially on the lack of triangulation.. there's a lot of room for improvement on the chassis. Which is why I've been working on the '07 model all day. Lot of stuff changing. 2 of the 3 bars you drew in were the first things I put in, some stuff movin around, changing a lot of wall thicknesses..

The torsional stiffness of our '06 system, including chassis and suspension, etc.. is somewhere around 900 ftlbs/degree.

KevinD
03-05-2006, 06:29 PM
you may also want to check up on this rule:

3.5.3.9 Air Intake and Fuel System Location Requirements
All parts of the fuel storage and supply system, and all parts of the
engine air and fuel control systems (including the throttle or carburetor,
and the complete air intake system, including the air cleaner and any air
boxes) must lie within the surface defined by the top of the roll bar and
the outside edge of the four tires (see figure 8).


All fuel tanks must be shielded from side impact collisions. Any fuel
tank which is located outside the Side Impact Structure required by 3.3.8,
must be shielded by the same rules outlined for Side Impact Structure
3.3.8. A firewall must also be incorporated, per section 3.4.10.1.


Any portion of the air intake system that is less than 350 mm (13.8
inches) above the ground must be protected by the same rules in Side
Impact Structure.

note the last paragraph. looks like your throttle body dips below the 13.8 inch mark (using the tire as a reference), and it also looks like it is outside of the side impact tubes.

Greg H
03-07-2006, 10:52 AM
Car 54 Drawings (http://community.webshots.com/myphotos?action=viewAllPhotos&albumID=548341466&security=DMbBKK)

These could have come out a little better had I not done everything but the frame myself. By the way Tyler, that thing still has some issues. Working on photoworks for future.

kwancho
03-07-2006, 11:13 AM
Did somebody already ask you about your front bulkhead triangulation? Because it looks like the top could use some additional support.

Kyle Walther
03-07-2006, 11:39 AM
just a little teaser
this is a close up of the power distribution underneath the driver.
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/5139/battery8di.th.jpg (http://img505.imageshack.us/my.php?image=battery8di.jpg)

Chris Allbee
03-07-2006, 11:49 AM
If you will notice the .015" aluminum gas tank. So thin as to be translucent, but we're pretty sure the burst strength is high enough. don't have any test data or dynamic fluid modeling to prove that, but i'm calling it good.

Sooner_Electrical
03-07-2006, 12:18 PM
Mighty Pretty Picture, I think you have it upside down though.

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/5177/actualpicture3kg.th.jpg (http://img216.imageshack.us/my.php?image=actualpicture3kg.jpg)

Pretty Close to the Actual Picture :-)

Jersey Tom
03-08-2006, 01:01 PM
If our bodywork doesn't all come out this year.. hopefully it'll look somethin like this next year..
http://webfiles.colorado.edu/szelag/sexy/render777.jpg

KU_Racing
03-08-2006, 01:16 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">If you will notice the .015" aluminum gas tank. So thin as to be translucent, but we're pretty sure the burst strength is high enough. don't have any test data or dynamic fluid modeling to prove that, but i'm calling it good. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Good job being a dickhead. Try not to talk about parts you have never seen and have no knowledge about.

Brian Perry
03-08-2006, 01:50 PM
Done in Solid Edge

<A HREF="http://img401.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mcmaster2006705rv.jpg" TARGET=_blank>http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/4663/mcmaster2006705rv.th.jp
g</A>

Brian
sae.mcmaster.ca (http://sae.mcmaster.ca)

drivetrainUW-Platt
03-08-2006, 03:23 PM
you guys doing these in Photoworks?

Jersey Tom
03-08-2006, 03:49 PM
Photoworks, and then the car #, gold paint, and rest of the text photoshop.