Thanks all, and thanks Anonymous Aero Judge for chiming in. The input is most appreciated.
AAJ, you have touched upon a point that was raised many times with me across the weekend. I won't mention team names, but approximately 22 of them mentioned at one stage or another across the weekend that they don't have access to the kind of aerodynamic development tools that Monash have. For the sake of these 22 anonymous teams, could I kindly ask you for a few words about:
1. Whether having a big wind tunnel helps your design score
2. What kind of aero development tools and tests would you use if you were building an FSAE car at a non-Monash university
I have a feeling that a team could score really well in Design if they could present a well-developed aero package without the use of a big wind tunnel. I also have a feeling that this is much more achievable than many teams think. And I also have a feeling that teams that call themselves "non-aero" teams might do themselves a lot of good in the design event if they were to present evidence of solid testing program justifying why they DON"T have aero, rather than using the "we don't do aero" argument as a scapegoat.
Apologies Mr AAJ if I am way off the mark with the above, but any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers all,