+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Gearbox

  1. #1
    I was wondering why a lot of fast teams use just 3 or 4 gears gearboxes.

    Anyone can help me to understand?

  2. #2
    I was wondering why a lot of fast teams use just 3 or 4 gears gearboxes.

    Anyone can help me to understand?

  3. #3
    What is the top speed of a motorcycle?
    What is the top speed of an FSAE car during competition?

    One fast acceleration run is 4 seconds. How much of that time do you want to spend with gear shifting?

  4. #4
    yeah, ok, but you can adjust final ratio and for sure you have a smaller wheel then a bike. SO i thought that if you choose a short final ratio you can use all your gears and keep the engine always in the right zone...

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Posts
    335
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Silente:
    yeah, ok, but you can adjust final ratio and for sure you have a smaller wheel then a bike. SO i thought that if you choose a short final ratio you can use all your gears and keep the engine always in the right zone... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    you can adjust the final drive ratio. you keep going shorter and shorter with the gearing and eventually you run out of traction and/or spend all your time shifting. That point happens before you effectively use all 6 gears.
    '01-'06 Cal Poly Pomona

  6. #6
    but so how you would adjust gearboxes to keep gears away?

    would you just put the last two gears away?

  7. #7
    Do you really NEED to "keep the gears away?" How about simply not shifting into 4th-5th-6th? Seems to work for most teams out there.

    If you are really interested, however, in 2005 The Univ. Akron had a pretty extensive engine development program. In that case we removed the unwanted gears from the gearbox, and replaced them with appropriate "blanks." There were non-trivial performance gains achieved in the reduction of rotating mass.
    Jason Stuffel
    -WARDJet.com
    -Zips Racing Alum 03-06

  8. #8
    If you got the engine apart anyway, maybe take one or two out, but for the gains to be truly significant would require modifications throughout the whole system. Which shafts are spinning the fastest(also would then be accelerating the fastest), and which parts in the system have the highest inertia x their shaft speeds.
    The answer to both of those questions are neither the transmission shafts or the gears, so although they shouldn't be ignored, they would be part of a much broader list of modifications.
    'engine and turbo guy'
    Cornell 02-03

  9. #9
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jdstuff:
    Do you really NEED to "keep the gears away?" How about simply not shifting into 4th-5th-6th? Seems to work for most teams out there.

    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Why leave them in if your not going to ever use them. to be a competitive team in design event you need to hit 450 lbs. every bit counts

  10. #10
    I know this is a little off subject but in 2007 we ran two motors on the dyno within a week of each other on the same exact car with the same compression, intake, cal, exhaust, ect. The only differences were that one had titanium rods and a knifed edged/lightened crankshaft and the other had stock rods/crankshaft. There was no noticeable differences.

    I just think things like this aren't worth the effort in FSAE. Besides the information that we gained we would have been better off spending that time/money on calibration, testing, or driver training. Our current power curve embarrasses our previous ones that had all the lightened rotating components. And those gains weren't hiding in some trick unknown location.

    But i must admit last year I had a design Judge call us out for not removing mass from our crank/gears/rods. He stated that other teams had claims of notable gains from it. I replied with the information from above but i don't think he bought it.

    I also agree with Keith it does help lower the overall weight of the car which is huge in design. But in most cases in FSAE the motors sits soo close to the ground that you might be negatively effecting the CG of the car (nothing worth noting though).

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts