Folks,
We're putting together a few notes on the 04 Aussie comp to talk about at the follow-up review meeting, before everyone forgets how it all went down.
The whole comp ran extremely well, but we got thrown a few curveballs - namely in the design and cost events, which weren't run how we expected them to be. The strict marking guideline for design judging was a little unexpected, but I actually preferred the way the cost event was run, compared to how the letter of the rules say... it was probably a better test of what we're meant to get out of this competition than getting asked things from a list.
How did everyone else go with the static events? Anyone care to pass comment on how discussion with judges went during the design event? All comments welcome, it'd be nice to know how it ran for everyone else...