Sorry to change the subject. But I've been speaking with the guys in my old team about design judging at FSG.
Although, sadly Design Judging wasn't part of their focus this year (long story, but the reason we're talking about it is because I'm convincing them that it should be next year). They don't seem to think that FSG use this document, or follow the same structure for scoring in Design.
http://www.fsaeonline.com/content/FS...et%20150pt.pdf
I argued that surely they must be. But thought I'd ask on here, and get it from the horse's mouth.
I think their main argument is that the judges they had weren't broken up the same way as the sheet, but rather covered different technical areas of the car.
They believe they had 2 vehicle dynamics judges, 1 electronics, 1 aero, 1 driver controls & calibration, 2 powertrain, and 2 on chassis.
This isn't a criticism, or a complaint, I wasn't there. But want to reassure them that they have the right information to focus on design for next year. So it would be good to get first hand clarification. Pat, are you around?