Originally posted by Dunk on this thread, and also the FSUK Comp thread:
... I don't agree that 2wd is better than 4wd for accel. ... if the cars are breaking traction, and the coefficient of friction cannot be increased (short of cu$tom tyre compounds), then
the only way to accelerate off the line faster is to drive all 4 wheels.
...
biasing all the mass to the rear of the car to maximise traction on the rear tyres, will not only make the cars impossible to control but also just darn terrible in every other event.
Maybe a [combustion] car designed purely for acceleration could keep up with the standard e-cars, i.e. a dragster that meet the regulations.
But that car would suffer in every other event, and would not beat a electric dragster. The issue being torque curves, dropping power to shift gear 2 or 3 times [blah, blah...]...
Copying last years car is an industry standard, because well it works. It means ... the problems [are] easy to solve.
But starting from the ground up with students who don't really know what they are doing and haven't got a clue ... is just going to [fail]...
Is it possible for the best combustion car to outperform the best electric car in acceleration under the current rules? ... doubtful ... a insurmountable amount of work for a bunch of inexperienced students to have to do in the space of 10 months.