+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5 13 14 15
Results 141 to 144 of 144

Thread: Formula SAE California 2011 Competition: - Updates, Pictures, Stories, and More

  1. #141
    Since many of you were unable to attend the presentation feedback session at Fontana, I wanted to share my notes.

    2011 FSAE-California Biz Feedback Notes

    Our veteran judges, some who have been here all six years, advised the overall quality was the best they have seen.

    This years’ group of judges was the best ever (IMO). We had representatives from Mazda, Toyota, Hyundai, KIA, Suzuki, and Coda. We had journalists, academics and retired racers. We even had a former F1 team manager.

    There were several near perfect scores. The top five were all viewed as amazing.

    Preparation – It was OBVIOUS who did and did not prepare.

    Showing up late in flip-flops and torn jeans and no presentation – just winging it. Really?

    To paraphrase Scottish literary critic Andrew Lang; “Many of you use Powerpoint like a drunken man uses light-posts….for support rather than illumination.”

    There is a phrase know in industry as “Death by Powerpoint”. Fancy graphics are great if they help you TELL THE STORY. Ask yourself if they did that?

    One of the top-five teams used no powerpoint whatsoever. Content and delivery outweighed the lack of fancy graphics.

    Handouts – About half of the teams had nothing. Really? Would you go to a job interview with no resume?

    For those teams speaking English as a second language, we had very positive comments overall. An outstanding job.

    Enthusiasm – The judges, especially the rookie judges, were surprised at how little enthusiasm many of you showed. Not sure if this was nerves, lack of sleep, or having the wrong team members doing the presentation. I KNOW you are enthused, but it failed to show in many instances.

    Get help from within your school. Is there any competing university that does NOT have a business department?

    Did you videotape your presentation? Why not? How will next years team improve?

    Comments from top presentations:
    “Extremely good market analysis”
    “Original approach”
    “Well balanced”
    “Nice handouts”
    “Outstanding delivery”
    “Answered questions well”
    “Good energy”
    “Students well dressed”
    “Well thought out”
    “Good talk of customer relationship”
    “Excellent financial analysis”
    “Great use of team members to answer questions”

    Comments on poor presentations:
    “Bare-bones”
    “Finished too early”
    “Ran late”
    “Showed up late”
    “Blank stare instead of answers”
    “No real financial proposal”
    “Did they even read the rules”
    “Poorly dressed”
    “No presentation, just winged it”
    “I expected a lot more from a school like……”
    “Sloppy presentation”
    “Needs to read rule book”
    “Made poor use of time.”
    “Wasted time in set-up.”
    “No sense of market.”
    “No clear idea of marketing.”
    “Not compelling.”
    “Work on delivery.”
    “Unsure of what they were pitching.”
    “No slides. No show and tell parts. Nothing.”

    I've enjoyed supporting this event since 2006 and wish everyone well in Nebraska, Michigan, or wherever you compete in 2012. My goal remains to assist as many of you as possible in finding gainful employment in the industry. My favorite moment was last year when one of the judges DEMANDED a resume from one of the presenters -- he was THAT IMPRESSED with what he had seen that he wanted to talk career options.

  2. #142
    I second Dean's comments about the quality of the cars at the 2011 event.

    The design and prep state of the cars we saw in Tech was much better throughout the field this year--very consistent throughout. The top half are always well prepared but we didn't have a bunch of dogs this year that needed a lot of work to pass. You guys must be doing a better job of reading the rules and Tech appreciated that! Not a bunch of 3-4 hour tech jobs with numerous trips to the welder! I recall only one "no hope" entry this year.

    I think the requirement to submit drawings of your chassis with your SEF helped as we were able to point out problem areas so you could fix things before showing up at the competition. Any comments on this point?

    Also, I think assigning random tech order numbers beforehand was an improvement to the process. It certainly was better than last year's "land rush" cluster! If we were to do it again in CA, we would need to fine tune things, of course. We would need to make sure that our order list in Tech gets updated when you swap numbers, and we needed a way to post the current number more prominently. Any comments from the Teams on this aspect?

    Overall, I think it was the best FSAE-CA event and kudos to the Teams for doing a really good job throughout the field on their designs and preparation!

    Gerry LaRue
    Chief of Tech Inspection

  3. #143
    KBB was at the California FSAE Competition

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEQ3gUniDcc

  4. #144
    ----
    Mike Cook
    It's an engineering competition, not an over-engineering competition!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5 13 14 15

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts