+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Impact Attenuator Calculations

  1. #21
    Has there ever been a 2 car collision at the competitions? I'm not worried about it. The course speeds are so pathetic that if a T-bone was immiment, you could probably stop or go around. There would be something to worry about if a car's throttle sticks open and the brakes fail and the brake overtravel switch fails and the car is in one of the faster gears and the driver panics instead of killing the engine. I'm willing to take that chance.

  2. #22
    Yeah, your right. It is about as likely as having a head on colision with anything at almost every competition. I guess someone might go through the same scenario as what you said, and drive a quarter mile off track and hit a curb.

    On a more realistic design note, the test tracks of most teams do have more risks than the competition. Ask the teams that have had a crash, better yet, all those who have had a crash should make a post with pics of the damage. If my memory serves me right, a few years back Cornell took a front-on collision with a curb and had significant damage.

    I guess, with the amount of poles in the parking lots and the inexperianced drivers, is there a chance of a sliding impact into a pole? I think there is as much a chance of this as there is a front impact.

    And my question still stands, has anyone made accomodations in design for the chance of a side impact.

    Thanks much,
    Bill

  3. #23
    Don't go givin people new ideas (rules (obstacles)) for us Bill. But to add a more blood curdling picture to your crushed pelvis scenario, think of what would happen if someone with side pods put the radiators in them. Not only would the crushing blow cause you to scream out in extreme pain, but the boiling water would now be spraying all over you, causing you to get 2nd degree burns. If your lucky, you'll go into shock or pass out from the pain.
    -----------------------------
    CFS13 - Drivetrain
    "The pleasure of driving shouldn't be something that's reserved for people with very deep pockets."-Conor (I modified it a little bit)

  4. #24
    ap - worse than that, there was a year (way back whe) our team's frontal impact attenuator WAS the radiator.

    We werent so smart back then..
    Colorado FSAE | '05 - '07
    Goodyear Tire & Rubber | '07 - '11
    NASCAR Engineer | '11 - ??

  5. #25
    Originally posted by Jersey Tom:
    ap - worse than that, there was a year (way back whe) our team's frontal impact attenuator WAS the radiator.
    Wow...
    -----------------------------
    CFS13 - Drivetrain
    "The pleasure of driving shouldn't be something that's reserved for people with very deep pockets."-Conor (I modified it a little bit)

  6. #26
    Our team has definately done embarassingly dumb stuff well before my time.

    The 07 car has potential to be an unbelieveable step up from our 06 even, which placed 22nd.
    Colorado FSAE | '05 - '07
    Goodyear Tire & Rubber | '07 - '11
    NASCAR Engineer | '11 - ??

  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, USA
    Posts
    6
    Hi all,

    I am from The Newcastle of University in Australia, and we made our impact attenuator out of 3 layers of aerolan, each separated by a sheet of aluminium. This was bonded with glue, with wire also used to keep the sandwich together.

    We did physical testing at uni with beyond standard results. It then decided (without a vote) to do some destructive testing at the 2006 Australian competition.



    Unfortunately the barriers in this area were made from 6 metre lengths of steel guardrail, with a gap in them at the height of every teams impact attenuator. That said, the nose of our car went through the gap and the chassis was effectively the first point of impact. I hope that the event organisers for future events refuse to use this style of barrier where frontal impacts could be expected to occur (ie small skid pans and practice tracks). This style of accident has happened on practice tracks before in Australia, but the other incident was with a water filled plastic barrier, with no chassis damage.

    This is no defence of our own design, as every team at this comp in the same scenario would have had their nose go straight through this hole and damage their own chassis. Fortunately with a steel space frame it is easy to cut and weld. Good luck to those of you with a composite chassis.

    BIG thanks again to UOA, UOW, RMIT, TAFE & Bill McBride for offering active assistance. We were back and running again for our next event.


    Luke Morrow
    UN Racing 2004-2007

  8. #28
    ap - worse than that, there was a year (way back whe) our team's frontal impact attenuator WAS the radiator.

    We werent so smart back then..

    Way way way back when I guess there was a year we did the same and also decided to use the frame tubes themselves as the coolant lines back to the engine ( I imagine there was some sort of rubber line pickup at each end).
    Buckingham

  9. #29
    We thought about that, use the rollbar is a radiator, untill someone grabbed it to push the car it might work ok.
    Mike Duwe
    UWP Alumni

    Former Drivetrain Leader and Team Captain

  10. #30
    From what I can tell, the impact attenuator report doesn't actually count for points. Its more of a pass / fail thing. Am I correct in proceeding with this assumption?
    UVic Formula SAE

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts