+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 97

Thread: Acceleration times

  1. #1
    Still excited about our accel. time in Baltic open, I'm asking for your best time in this event, during testing or training.

    Our time with the Chalmers 06 car was 3.75s and 109 km/h.

    Helsinki wasn't far behind with 3.77s with there 06 car.

    As far as I know this is the best time in any event. Wich makes our car the fastest in the world...

    Am I right?

    /Per
    CFS
    More is better

  2. #2
    Wich makes our car the fastest in the world...
    No offence, since when is FSAE all about straight line acceleration? IMHO the fastest car is the one with the highest overall score from the dynamic events.

    Peter
    Delft (where less is more )

  3. #3
    Yeeesh 3.75 is fasssst. Remind me, what'd you guys do at West? What made the big difference?

  4. #4
    Just to add to the discussion: exactly how were the times measured? With a transponder mounted at the rear end of the car, or by other means? How exact were those 30cm behind the line? How many runs did the teams get? What kind of surface? Obviously, al these things have a big influence on your times...

    What I mean to say, you really can't compare the times from different competitions, so saying you have the fastest car is a bit too much. No offence intended though. You guys have a very nice car

    MH

  5. #5
    There is a difference between fast and quick. You may not have the fastest(topend) but you may have the quickest(accel). Anyway it goes, I am not going to jump on here like others and shoot down your joy of a substantial accomplishment.

    Sure, Fsae isn't about accel, it's about everything. But then again, when was the last time that you saw the 1st place car win every event. I am sure that when they won, no one ws standing there saying "Duuuuhhhh, we beet ya in dat der dollar purt a da comp." We jacked them off repeatedly for weeks on there accomplishments, as anyone should. And why shouldn't the other guys get to do the same for something no one is recognizing them on the forum for?

    Oh well, I think RMIT cheated, maybe they had sex with the judges. The Toronto driver was on steroids. Texas A&M's car had the ability of human though and drove itself and gave its own presentations.

    Give credit where due,
    Congrats Chalmers, and don't take some asses ball busting cause they have a small pair.
    Bill Kunst

  6. #6
    Just to be clear: I really like the Chalmers car, it looks and sounds fantastic.
    All I'm saying is that a time of 3,75 is amazing, but you should consider all the circumstances before claiming you have the fastest car in the world.
    For example the guys from Graz claim 3,6 sec runs regularly during testing, does that mean THEY have the fastest car in the world?

    @Bill: after reading your deep, meaningful and well-arguemented post, I'm really curious: does your post mean YOU have a big pair????

    MH

  7. #7
    That was just what I was asking for, and it doesn't suprise me that a car like Graz can run that fast under good conditions. Electronics is also important to run stable times.

    Unfortunately we don't have any electronics yet, therefore we see a great viriation in our times.

    In Finland, Delfts fotocell timing system was used. Thankx for that by the way, Delft!

    Otherwise the conditions in Finland were pretty good. Tarmac was nice, and tyres were pretty warm. But we ran on our England tyres, they were a bit slippery.

    Alex Kwan: The difference from USA West is a supercharger. Mounted on a completely new vehicle... The car you are talking about, also known as the "Volvo car", is our -05 car, this is our -06 car.

    You might see it in West next year.

    /Per
    More is better

  8. #8
    MH,
    What is your name, where are you from, and all the rest?

    I think that you can read pretty close to the type of personality each person has on here. I am merely trying to defend someone who was excited about how well they did and was asking "Is our car the fastest?" I just found it annoying that lloper and chalmers gets slammed because you need proof that they are fastest. Maybe we should have all the cars at one event. How do we know that the winner of FSAE west is really a championship car? Sure, you cannot compare the scores on events to scores from other events. But I think, just short of them running the car in a vacuum, accel times could be compared. Hell, a person who had doubts could have said something like, "If its not the fastest, it got to be one of them for sure! Congrats!" And then that person could have sat at home and stewed over it.

    Bill Kunst

  9. #9
    Under 3.8 is awfully quick. Never heard of an SAE car that fast. 4.0 wins in the US in the dry
    Colorado FSAE | '05 - '07
    Goodyear Tire & Rubber | '07 - '11
    NASCAR Engineer | '11 - ??

  10. #10
    Originally posted by Iloper:
    Alex Kwan: The difference from USA West is a supercharger. Mounted on a completely new vehicle... The car you are talking about, also known as the "Volvo car", is our -05 car, this is our -06 car.

    You might see it in West next year.

    /Per
    Ah, sweet. Bring it to West!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts