+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: I need all the info about the crush zone!!!

  1. #31
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jimmy01:
    I think you are getting yourself confused with mass, weight and force.

    The maximum average force(F)(to keep acceleration under 20G) which the attenuator can apply is very easy to calculate:

    M = mass of 'car'= 300kg
    a = 20 * 9.81 m/s2 = 196.2 m/s2

    F = Ma = 58860N </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I thought that 20gs of 300kg would be 6000kg? For instance, let's say you weigh 200lbs. At 2g's, you weight 400lbs, 3g's is 600lbs etc. Doesn't that same logic apply?

  2. #32
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by twinky64:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jimmy01:
    I think you are getting yourself confused with mass, weight and force.

    The maximum average force(F)(to keep acceleration under 20G) which the attenuator can apply is very easy to calculate:

    M = mass of 'car'= 300kg
    a = 20 * 9.81 m/s2 = 196.2 m/s2

    F = Ma = 58860N </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I thought that 20gs of 300kg would be 6000kg? For instance, let's say you weigh 200lbs. At 2g's, you weight 400lbs, 3g's is 600lbs etc. Doesn't that same logic apply? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    6000kg = 58860N, Einstein.
    DUT Racing Team (Delft) 2008-2010

  3. #33
    Your logic is fine, but I don't think 'weight' should ever be used in an engineering context. Mass and forces are all you need.
    UoA 07'-?
    www.fsae.co.nz

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts