https://picasaweb.google.com/singh3508/DropBox?authkey=Gv1sRgCKmKy7K9ioHdCA&pli=1#5573551960143773586
is this type of attachment allowed in fsae for belts???
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: clark
https://picasaweb.google.com/singh3508/DropBox?authkey=Gv1sRgCKmKy7K9ioHdCA&pli=1#5573551960143773586
is this type of attachment allowed in fsae for belts???
https://picasaweb.google.com/singh3508/DropBox?authkey=Gv1sRgCKmKy7K9ioHdCA&pli=1&gsessionid=zPOA6F7AE4f05gXVeIazTw#5573469055834750722
is this type of attachment allowed ????
https://picasaweb.google.com/singh3508/DropBox?authkey=Gv1sRgCKmKy7K9ioHdCA&pli=1&gsessionid=zPOA6F7AE4f05gXVeIazTw#5573469055834750722
is this type of attachment allowed ????
During the analysis of control arms in solidworks, what all constraints are to be applied to arrive at a justifiable factor of safety?????
During the analysis of control arms in solidworks, what all constraints are to be applied to arrive at a justifiable factor of safety?????
what element may i choose for chassis members . ?? if i choose beam 189 ,it is 3 node element so u can not create it by plotting nodes, it has to be made by lines and then mesh to generate nodes, if...
what element may i choose for chassis members . ?? if i choose beam 189 ,it is 3 node element so u can not create it by plotting nodes, it has to be made by lines and then mesh to generate nodes, if...
billy the problem is that u can apply end release to a node only. but beam 189 is a 3 node element.. and how can we relate both co ordinate systems in ansys's language (i mean in interface of...
to conduct our TR test with suspension components mounted on it i need to model bellcrank. revolute element is suitable but i am not able to use it on beam elements which comprises our chassis...
to conduct our TR test with suspension components mounted on it i need to model bellcrank. revolute element is suitable but i am not able to use it on beam elements which comprises our chassis...
good take bobby. of course there will be other longitudinal forces in both cases. But why is everyone so silent about the assumption question of mine.....????
no doubt that force will be upwards on all wheels but,In FEA you need to fix something and apply force on other.. that is why i have written is my assumption tolerable
i also think this is low value. we are currently having abt 5000lb-feet/deg. but then u need to have a proper co ordination with ur suspension. if suspension is stiff enough ,then it can be okay
after conducting torsional stiffness on ansys i want to do FEA for forces in braking and acc. IS the assumption of fixing rear wheels and applying upward force on front wheels allowable in case of...
ff
ff
thanx every one. hey jordon, im using ansys for analysis. i input all the keypoints whose co ordinates are taken from solidworks. since ansys is more reliable than solidworks. i use gui method.there...
there is a problem . when i make the frame of chassis using key points and lines. lines do not join properly at single point. like if there are 4 lines meeting at a point then 2 of them are in...
there is a problem . when i make the frame of chassis using key points and lines. lines do not join properly at single point. like if there are 4 lines meeting at a point then 2 of them are in...
i have modeled my chassis as lines in ansys 12. can anyone please tell me about the choice of beam element type??im waiting
i have modeled my chassis as lines in ansys 12. can anyone please tell me about the choice of beam element type??im waiting